Detoxify: Difference between revisions
Hornedglory (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{| align="right" !colspan="2" style="background:#ed668c; text-align:center"| '''Detoxify''' |- |'''Syntax''' || Automatic |- |'''Type''' || Defense |- |} Trained in purifying poisons from others, water scholars have learned the means of flushing poisons from their own bodies without even sparing effort upon the matter. The detoxify skill provides a resistance to all manner of poison, including those used by assassins, though it is by no means proof against...") |
Undaedalus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| | {{skill | ||
|name= Detoxify | |||
| | |type= Skill | ||
| | |subtype= [[Status effect]] defense | ||
| | |user= [[Water scholar]] | ||
| | |duration= | ||
| | |castingCost= | ||
|tickCost= | |||
Trained in purifying poisons from others, water scholars have learned the means of flushing poisons from their own bodies without even sparing effort upon the matter. The detoxify skill provides a resistance to all manner of poison, including those used by [[ | |pulseCost= | ||
|range= | |||
|delay= | |||
|requirements= | |||
|syntax= Automatic | |||
}} | |||
Trained in purifying poisons from others, water scholars have learned the means of flushing poisons from their own bodies without even sparing effort upon the matter. The detoxify skill provides a resistance to all manner of [[poison]], including those used by [[prepare|assassins]], though it is by no means proof against the latter. | |||
[[Category:Abilities]] | [[Category:Abilities]] | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 9 March 2024
Detoxify
| |
|---|---|
| Skill type: | Skill |
| Skill subtype: | Status effect defense |
| Primary user: | Water scholar |
| Syntax: | Automatic |
Trained in purifying poisons from others, water scholars have learned the means of flushing poisons from their own bodies without even sparing effort upon the matter. The detoxify skill provides a resistance to all manner of poison, including those used by assassins, though it is by no means proof against the latter.
